Semantics aside, the planned

Semantics aside, the planned assault on Parliament Hill was not considered as an Act of War (which would bring about the alternate terminology you suggest) but as a simple terrorist attack on the Canadian people. Do you mean to suggest that the FLQ did not commit acts of terrorism? That they were (are) a legitimate political force?

Still, current reports suggest that plan was abandoned and the current plan was to set off one or more bombs in downtown Toronto, a civilian target and a terrorist attack by any reasonable definition.

Reply

Please enter Brad's last name above. Case doesn't matter
Please make up a name if you do not wish to give your real one.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options