For background material

See the New Democracy tag above, in particular the article on goals of voting systems. Plain paper works great in Canada, but is not so workable for the USA which may have 20 or more questions on a ballot. And the questions are different in each ward of each town. And the lobbies for the blind and disabled and non-English-speakers have a strong voice that opposes paper because they think machines which can assist disabled voters are a must.

The public of course would not care about open source, just the verifiers. But in fact, in the two-machine design with intermediate human readable paper ballot, you don't care all that much about the security of the first half so verification is nice but not essential.

Reply

Please enter Brad's last name above. Case doesn't matter
Please make up a name if you do not wish to give your real one.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options