That's what I describe

Except the RAID concept can be extended much further. If you have a file that takes up 8 drives worth of space, you can store it on 16 different drives such that you can lose any 8 of them and still recover the file (or perhaps it is 7). So only twice the space to be able to withstand a major loss, an extremely unlikely loss if the 8 drives are at 8 different facilities.

However, as soon as you lose 9 drives you have lost *everything* which is the downside. (Same for Raid 5. You can lose 1 drive OK, but 2 drives and all your data is gone, which is why people go to RAID 6 for large arrays, where you can lose 2 drives, and 3 takes you out.)

Yes, I understand you want to store all the extra footage. So increase the size tenfold. It's still no $12,000 per year.

Reply

Please enter Brad's last name above. Case doesn't matter
Please make up a name if you do not wish to give your real one.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options