<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://ideas.4brad.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Brad Ideas - We strike down the broadcast flag! - Comments</title>
 <link>http://ideas.4brad.com/archives/000205.html</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;We strike down the broadcast flag!&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://ideas.4brad.com/archives/000205.html#comment-490</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Brad,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just wanted to stop by and congratulate, and thank you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;--&lt;br /&gt;
John &quot;Fellow MythTV HDTV geek&quot; Sturgeon &amp;lt;&amp;gt;&lt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 05:40:46 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Sturgeon</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 490 at http://ideas.4brad.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>We strike down the broadcast flag!</title>
 <link>http://ideas.4brad.com/archives/000205.html</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;On both a personal and professional note, I am happy to report that the federal courts have &lt;a href=&quot;http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/common/opinions/200505/04-1037b.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;unanimously ruled to strike down the FCC&#039;s broadcast flag&lt;/a&gt; (that&#039;s a PDF)  due to our lawsuit against them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I participated directly in this lawsuit, filing an affadavit on how, as a builder of a MythTV system and writer of software for MythTV, I would be personally harmed if the flag rule went into effect.   The thrust of the case was that the FCC, which is empowered to regulated interstate communications, had no authority to regulate what goes on inside your PC.   The court bought that, but we had to show that the actual plaintiffs in the case would be harmed, not simply the general public, thus the declarations by myself and various other members of EFF and other plaintiffs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The broadcast flag was an insidious rule because, as I like to put it, it didn&#039;t prohibit Tivo from making a Tivo (as long as they got it certified as having pledged allegiance  to the flag.)  It stopped somebody from designing the next Tivo, the metaphorical Tivo, meaning bold new innovation in recording TV.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would like to particularly thank Public Knowledge, which spearheaded this effort and funded most of it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D89TTEFG0.htm?campaign_id=apn_home_down&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AP  Interview with me&lt;/a&gt; on the issue.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://ideas.4brad.com/archives/000205.html#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://ideas.4brad.com/archives/cat_media.html">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://ideas.4brad.com/archives/cat_technology.html">Technology</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 03:55:55 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">203 at http://ideas.4brad.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
