<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://ideas.4brad.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Brad Ideas - Robocars: The Roadmap to getting there - Comments</title>
 <link>http://ideas.4brad.com/robocars-roadmap-getting-there</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Robocars: The Roadmap to getting there&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>links</title>
 <link>http://ideas.4brad.com/robocars-roadmap-getting-there#comment-6003</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I hope you will consider joining the Advanced Transit Association (advancedtransit.org) if you haven&#039;t already. Some of our members promote your ideas and are developing them. I haven&#039;t seen a link here to cybercars.org, which gives a lot of links to European companies and research. There are some cybercars/robocars in operation in Europe.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:48:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6003 at http://ideas.4brad.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>getting there without admitting it</title>
 <link>http://ideas.4brad.com/robocars-roadmap-getting-there#comment-5761</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I suspect that we can get much of the way towards the robocar vision without actually admitting it. That is, as you described, robocars will be sold as regular cars with crash-resistance built in as a feature. Then, as people realize that they can tune out while &quot;driving,&quot; they&#039;ll start paying less and less attention. At some point, people will admit that they are actually passengers and not drivers, but at first it will be, &quot;I&#039;m just letting the crash-avoidance system take over for a few seconds while I find my kid&#039;s sippy cup.&quot; Those few seconds turn into minutes as people learn what they can get away with.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 05:51:14 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Markos O&#039;Neill</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5761 at http://ideas.4brad.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Whoops</title>
 <link>http://ideas.4brad.com/robocars-roadmap-getting-there#comment-5759</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;edit: Should&#039;ve read the &quot;Objections&quot; page. Since the roads are already very wide, just painting lines and making laws protecting cyclists might do the job in the meantime.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 03:37:58 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Yoozer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5759 at http://ideas.4brad.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Not only robocars, but infrastructure</title>
 <link>http://ideas.4brad.com/robocars-roadmap-getting-there#comment-5758</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;While there&#039;s few things I&#039;d love more than step into a car and not worry about driving at all to work - it&#039;s not driving for pleasure at all, but a stress- and congestion-filled mess - the bigger issue is that right now, the US is very much based on the idea of cheap fuel. It&#039;s not just the efficient robocars that have to change the transport landscape, but also the infrastructure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Changing the infrastructure and allowing people to use a bike or to just walk instead of infrastructure being hostile to these forms of transport would also do good - because it&#039;d eliminate the need for a car for smaller distances. The 3-wheeled Aerorider you showed can negate concerns about weather and carrying things - it&#039;s just that the cost is much higher than that of a conventional bike, which couldn&#039;t work as smoothly in regular traffic due to its lack of speed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 03:32:50 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Yoozer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5758 at http://ideas.4brad.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Robocars: The Roadmap to getting there</title>
 <link>http://ideas.4brad.com/robocars-roadmap-getting-there</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.templetons.com/brad/robocars/roadmap.html&gt;&lt;img class=blogpic width=20% src=http://www.templetons.com/brad/robocars/4cars.jpg&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
In part two of my series on Robocars, let me introduce:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.templetons.com/brad//robocars/roadmap.html&quot; title=&quot;reference on The Roadmap to Robocars&quot; target=&quot;_self&quot;&gt;The Roadmap to Robocars&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here I outline a series of steps along the way to the full robocar world.   We won&amp;#8217;t switch all at once, and many more limited technologies can be marketed before the day when most cars on the road are computer driven.  Here are some ideas of what those steps could be &amp;#8212; or already are.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br clear=all&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://ideas.4brad.com/robocars-roadmap-getting-there#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://ideas.4brad.com/topic/robocars">Robocars</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:39:19 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">783 at http://ideas.4brad.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
