<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://ideas.4brad.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Brad Ideas - anonymity - Comments</title>
 <link>http://ideas.4brad.com/tags/anonymity</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;anonymity&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>PKI Strikes Again?</title>
 <link>http://ideas.4brad.com/unique-pseudonyms-qid#comment-5292</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What you really proposes is an incarnation of X.509-based PKI. This haven&#039;t been deployed and it looks like it will never get globally deployed. I don&#039;t think that QIDs are the right way to go. Bad things happen and remedy of stolen identity and re-establishing good reputation may be extremely difficult with that. And government control of the QIDs may be a problem under some governments (as you yourself say in the other blog posts).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 10:22:07 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Radovan Semancik</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5292 at http://ideas.4brad.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
